Sports fans can debate the new deal between the Bears and runner
Matt Forte. But to political science fans there's no debate. His $31
million proves our Founding Fathers were right. They anticipated
confrontations like management & labor...Democrat &
Republican...church & state...rich & poor. The Founding Fathers
called them "factions," and created checks & balances to keep
confrontations from turning into rebellions.
Right about now it's
safe to assume Matt doesn't give a damn. I mean, he got his; let the
other classes work it out for themselves. But when you hear about class
warfare, hasn't the rich class already won the war? They say: not
necessarily. While the poor class can talk about the 99:1 %, the rich
class has their own target: Entitlements.
A pretty explosive
term, focusing on those factions of the population who are getting
Social Security, Medicare, Medicaid, disability checks, and public
pension checks. [The dreaded Welfare State]. No lack of infuriating
headlines to make the case. Every day poor people falsely getting Social
Security, cheating Medicare & Medicaid, not to mention those
outrageous teacher/cop/firefighter pensioners raping the system with
their ill-gotten, double-dipping payments!
The headlines should
make anyone angry. Only the headlines are referring mostly to the 10%
who cheat the system, not the 90% who earned their modest monthly checks
via years of modest public service.
We're witnessing another
prickly chapter in our democracy's history of class confrontations. Matt
Forte is just fine, folks. Really. It's the rest of us who need to sort
this out to find whatever disinformation is coming from both sides.
Until then, here's a question for you: Is Matt Forte as "entitled" to
his $31 million/year as the 85 year old widow in Florida is to her
$3100/month....?
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment